As Ethereum became popular over the years, it became more evident that the network had issues like high transaction fees and slow processing times compared to other projects. To solve these problems, Layer 2 solutions such as Starknet and ZKSync have been developed. Both of these solutions aim to improve Ethereum’s scalability, albeit not in the same way.
Do you want to know the differences between Starknet and ZKSync? Read on to find out more.
What is Starknet
Starknet is a Layer 2 scaling service that uses the STARK technology (Scalable Transparent Argument of Knowledge). STARK is a cryptographic type of proof that allows the processing of off-chain transactions outside the main ETH network. These proofs are then recorded on-chain in a more secure and effective manner. The goal is to reduce contention, lower fees, and increase transactions per second on the Ethereum blockchain.
What is ZKSync
This is another Layer 2 solution using zero-knowledge rollups. Similar to Starknet, ZKsync processes transactions off-chain and then bundles them together to record them on the mainnet. However, ZKsync specifically uses ZK-rollups, a different type of cryptographic proof than STARKs. These rollups also allow for swift, low-cost transactions that promise high security.
Key Differences Between the Two
Starknet and ZKSync have several differences that separate them from each other. Below, we discuss some of these differences under various categories:
Technology Used
- Starknet: Uses STARK for scalability.
- ZKSync: Uses zero-knowledge rollups.
Transaction Speed and Cost
- Starknet: Allows swift processing speeds of up to several thousands of transactions per second (TPS). It also offers low fees, although the technology is more complex.
- ZKSync: Known for being fast, cost-effective, and considered easier to integrate for developers.
Security
- Starknet: Offers strong security through its STARK technology, which is transparent and does not require a trusted setup.
- ZKSync: It also offers high security with zk-rollups but requires a trusted setup, which some may view as a drawback.
Adoption and Ecosystem
- Starknet: Although still in its early stages, it’s gaining popularity, especially among projects that require high scalability.
- ZKSync: Due to its simplicity and ease of use, ZKsync has experienced better user adoption.
Development Focus
- Starknet: Centered on scalability and efficient handling of large volumes of transactions.
- ZKSync: Focuses on quick integration and ease of use, making it popular for projects that want to scale quickly.
Which Should You Choose
The choice of Layer 2 solutions depends solely on your specific needs. If you’re working on a project that requires handling a large number of transactions and values decentralization, Starknet may be the better choice. However, if it’s a much easier-to-implement project, you can consider using ZKSync as the way to go.
Wrap Up
Both zkSync and Starknet are powerful innovations designed to increase Ethereum’s scalability and efficiency. They share some similarities, but their technologies and focuses set them apart. Therefore, consider all we’ve discussed before deciding which solution is best for your project.